Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mirza Basic vs Pavel Verbin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Basic vs Verbin analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirza Basic vs Pavel Verbin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Basic 0 - 0 Verbin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Basic has won 53.41% of points on their second serve, while Verbin has won 50.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Basic, in recent form, has won 50.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Verbin has won 48.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.18% and 36.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Basic has saved 59.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verbin has saved 60.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Basic has won 57.78% of matches played (W/L 26/ 19), with Verbin winning 63.64% (W/L 42/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 140/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Verbin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 27/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 46/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.52% of matches (W/L 20/ 11), where as Verbin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 42/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Basic has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.78 while Verbin has played against players with an average rank of 30.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Basic has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verbin has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Basic has converted 41.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verbin has converted 43.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
717
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
56% (476-367)
Career Total W/L
56% (88-68)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
68% (28-13)
$478,883
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mirza Basic vs Pavel Verbin For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Basic VS Verbin
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mirza Basic | Pavel Verbin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 68% (28/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (41/25) | 64% (62/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (353/296) | 55% (540/443) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 72% (13/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 63% (10/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 110 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:6 | 1:1:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 168.9 | 49.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1309/1983) | 68% (1155/1701) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (942/1309) | 66% (761/1155) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (360/674) | 50% (274/546) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (85/203) | 43% (72/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (841/2119) | 41% (697/1712) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (18/9) | 68% (28/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 68% (28/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 60% (9/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (22/19) | 92% (26/24) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (22/3) | 8% (26/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 27% (15/4) |
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Mirza Basic
Player
Jakub Paul
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Jay Clarke
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Lenny Petit
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mirza Basic
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Filip Krolo
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Mirza Basic
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Mirza Basic
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
view more
Pavel Verbin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Pavel Verbin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Verbin
Player
Max Stenzer
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavel Verbin
Player
Christian Fellin
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Savva Polukhin
Player
Pavel Verbin
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Verbin
Player
Danir Kaldybekov
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aaron Gil Garcia
Player
Pavel Verbin
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Pavel Verbin
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Pavel Verbin
Player
Sergio Badini
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
60 of
77)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Basic Vs Verbin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Basic are available here and Verbin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
